Sample Page

Sample Page Title

Radeon RX 7600

Rated: 8/10

Radeon RX 6700

Rated: 8.2/10


Pros & Cons

GPUProsCons
Radeon RX 6700✅ HDMI 2.1 functionality
✅ Compact design with improved heat dissipation
❌ Average ray tracing performance
Radeon RX 7600✅ Flawless 1080p gaming
✅ Optimal performance with an 8-pin power connector
❌ Ray tracing performance needs improvement

Key Takeaways
  • The RX 6700 exhibits a slight 0.6% advantage over the RX 7600 in terms of performance.
  • The RX 6700 shows an impressive 6.4% lower average power consumption than the RX 7600. With a 5.5% more thermal advantage, 6700 is a clear winner.
  • The RX 7600 cost about $269, while the RX 6700 was pricier at around $350, creating a 43% price difference.
  • The RX 7600 is cheaper for basic 1080p gaming. The RX 6700 costs more but offers better performance and efficiency. Choose based on budget and gaming needs.

Why Trust Tech4Gamers
  • Manaf is our comparison expert who has been benchmarking graphics cards, and processors.
  • 100+ components tested and reviewed by our team of hardware experts (Tech4Gamers Team).
  • 100+ hours spent testing different components for our comparisons.
  • Objective testing criteria (See how we compare PC hardware).

At Tech4Gamers, ensuring you get reliable information is our priority. That’s why every hardware round-up undergoes a meticulous review process by our team of experts and editors. Each review is carefully examined against our strict editorial guidelines, guaranteeing you trustworthy insights you can depend on.

Comparison Table

Technical SpecsRadeon RX 7600Radeon RX 6700
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0RDNA 2.0
Transistors13,300 million17,200 million
RT Cores3234
TMUs128144
ROPs6464
Memory Bus Width128 bit160 bit
Memory Bandwidth288.0 GB/s320.0 GB/s

Architectural Differences

  • Process Node: The RX 7600, built on a 6nm process, outperforms the RX 6700, which utilizes a 12nm process.
  • Clock Speed: In terms of boost clock speeds, the RX 7600 leads the way with a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz, while the RX 6700 lags with a base clock of 1941 MHz and a boost clock of 2174 MHz.
  • VRAM: Furthermore, regarding VRAM, the RX 7600 packs 8GB of GDDR6 memory, while the RX 6700 boasts a larger capacity of 10GB of GDDR6 VRAM.
  • TDP: Additionally, in terms of thermal design, the RX 7600 operates with a lower TDP of 165W, while the RX 6700 has a slightly higher TDP of 175W.

AMD just extended its RDNA 3.0 lineup with a new inclusion of the RX 7600 in it. But how does it differ in performance compared to the previously released RX 6700? We already reviewed the RX 7600 but in this article, we will compare the RX 7600 and RX 6700 graphics cards to help you choose the right one for your computer. We’ll outline their differences and gaming performance.


Gaming Benchmarks

Let’s shift our attention from the technical specifications to the RX 7600 and RX 6700 gaming performance.

Testing Rig

Spider-Man Miles Morales

Spider-Man Miles Morales 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Right off the bat, I saw the RX 6700  performing 11.9% better in Spider-Man Miles Morales.  On average, it provided 91 fps. Contrary to that, the 7600 was roughly 5 frames behind, giving us an average of 86 fps. 
  • 1% lows on the RX 7600 are at  73 FPS, while the RX 6700 had lows of 75 FPS.

Forza Horizon 5

Forza Horizon 5 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
Forza Horizon 5 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The RX 6700 dominates in Forza Horizon 5, providing 5.6% more frames and running the game at over 100 fps. While the RX 7600 at 96 fps did not disappoint me at all.
  • This time, even its 1% lows are better than RX 7600. It was able to offer an average of 85 1% low fps. The RX 7600, on the other hand, had no chance of catching up as it maxed out at 69 fps.

Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
Red Dead Redemption 2 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Both GPUs faced challenges in running Red Dead Redemption 2, but the RX 7600 outperformed the 6700 by 8.8%, delivering an average of 76 fps compared to the 6700’s 83 fps.
  • I noticed that both GPUs have nearly identical 1% lows. The 7600 edges out the competition by a mere 1 fps, which isn’t surprising given the performance of the 6700.

Hogwarts Legacy

Hogwarts Legacy 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
Hogwarts Legacy 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • For the Hogwarts Legacy, I saw that the RX 7600 runs at 71 fps, which is 4.3% better than the 6700’s 68 fps. But honestly, you won’t notice the difference in real life.
  • The difference in 1% lows was slightly higher, in favor of the RX 7600.  On average at 47 fps. The RX 6700, at the same time, was 12 frames behind, at 35 1% low fps. 

Hitman 3

Hitman 3 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
Hitman 3 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In Hitman 3, using the slight 2.5% difference in average FPS performance, the RX 6700 surpasses the RX 7600 with 120 FPS compared to the latter’s 117 FPS.
  • Results of the 1% lows were not too different from what I had seen previously, as the 6700 was still ahead. It managed to yield 85 1% low fps on average. The 7600 maxed out at 82 fps.

The Last of Us Part I 

The Last of Us Part I 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
The Last of Us Part I 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Remarkably, In The Last of Us Part I, the RX 6700 exhibits a substantial 10.6% advantage over the RX 7600, delivering an impressive 79 FPS versus the latter’s 71 FPS in average FPS performance.
  • The RX 7600 experienced slightly lower 1% lows, averaging around 56 FPS, compared to the RX 6700, which maintained lows of 61 FPS.

A Plague Tale: Requiem

A Plague Tale: Requiem 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
A Plague Tale: Requiem 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • A Plague Tale: Requiem preferred the 7600 over the RX 6700, providing 2.7% more fps. On average, it provided 73 fps. The RX 6700, on the other hand, was seen struggling as it was 2 frames behind, averaging nearly 71 fps.  
  • Furthermore, the 7600 maintained its dominance with a 2-frame lead in 1% lows, averaging around 61 FPS, while the 6700 struggled at 58 FPS. 

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Finally, In Cyberpunk I noticed that the RX 7600 exhibits a 6.1% advantage over the RX 6700, delivering an average FPS of 67 compared to the latter’s 63.
  • Similarly, Lead was taken by RX 7600 as its 1% lows were also slightly higher at around 54 FPS, while the RX 6700 had lows of 51 FPS.

Overall Gaming Performance

FeaturedRadeon RX 7600Radeon RX 6700
Average FPS83 📈87 📈
%1 lows62 📉65 📉
Winner: AMD Radeon RX 6700

At 1080p, I observed that the AMD Radeon RX 6700 outperformed the AMD Radeon RX 7600 by approximately 0.6% in average fps. Based on my testing, the difference in the mean of 1% lows between both GPUs was slightly larger at around 4.6% in favor of the AMD Radeon RX 6700.


Power Consumption

GameRX 7600 Power (Watts)RX 6700 Power (Watts)
Spider-Man Miles Morales156.2166.5
Forza Horizon 5156.3148.5
Red Dead Redemption 2166.2150.6
Hogwarts Legacy163.6151.1
Hitman 3173.7156.6
The Last of Us Part I163.9137.5
A Plague Tale: Requiem158.2148.3
Cyberpunk 2077159.5154.1
Average Power Consumption162.6⚡️152.14⚡️
Winner: AMD Radeon RX 6700

The overall power consumption of our system with the RX 7600 was approximately 162.6 watts, whereas, with the RX 6700, it averaged around 152.14 watts. The RX 6700  consumed 6.4% less power.


Thermal Statistics

GameRX 7600 (°C)RX 6700 (°C)
Spider-Man Miles Morales6562
Forza Horizon 56361
Red Dead Redemption 26960
Hogwarts Legacy6761
Hitman 36664
The Last of Us Part I6361
A Plague Tale: Requiem6760
Cyberpunk 20776762
Average Temperature65.5 🌡️61.88 🌡️
Winner: AMD Radeon RX 6700

This slight thermal advantage of 5.5% suggests greater efficiency for the RX 6700, although both GPUs remained within safe operating limits and didn’t approach thermal throttling.


Price And Value

Graphics CardLaunch MSRPCurrent Price
RX 7600💲269💲259
RX 6700💲479💲787
Difference43%67%

The RX 7600 was priced at approximately 269 USD, while the RX 6700 had a higher price point of around 350 USD. This resulted in a significant price gap of 43%. Now, there is a huge price difference of almost 67% between these two.


What Do We Recommend?

RX 6700: The RX 6700 outperforms the RX 7600 in gaming, has HDMI 2.1, and stays cool with its compact design. It uses less power and handles heat better. Plus, it’s priced lower for good value.

RX 7600: The RX 7600 is great for smooth 1080p gaming with its 8-pin power connector. It’s cheaper than the RX 6700 but might need better ray tracing. If you want a budget-friendly option for 1080p gaming, go for the RX 7600.

The RX 7600 is cheaper and good for basic 1080p gaming. The RX 6700 costs more but offers better gaming, power, and thermal performance. If you want better gaming and efficiency, go for the RX 6700. It all depends on your budget and gaming needs.


FAQs

What is the main difference between the RX 7600 and RX 6700?

The main difference lies in the foundation, as the RX 7600 utilizes the new RDNA 3.0 base, and the RX 6700 relies on the previous-gen RDNA 2.0 architecture.

Which graphics card offers better FPS performance, the RX 7600 or RX 6700?

The RX 6700 takes the lead in FPS performance with a small 0.6% advantage over the RX 7600.

In terms of power consumption, which graphics card is more efficient?

The RX 6700 exhibits greater power efficiency, consuming approximately 8.3% less power on average compared to the RX 7600.


More from RX 7600:

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

RTX 4070 Ti Super Vs RTX 3090: Worth Upgrading? [Tested]

Check out our in-depth comparison of RTX 4070 Ti Super vs RTX 3090 where we closely monitor and highlight performance differences and key features of both GPUs.

RTX 4080 Super Vs RX 7800 XT: Gaming Performance Tested

Check out our comparison of RTX 4080 Super vs RX 7800 XT as we highlight the performance, price and architectural difference of both GPUs.

RTX 4080 Super Vs RX 7900 XTX: Gaming Benchmarks Tested

See the differences in both GPUs' pricing, performance, and architecture as we compare the RX 7900 XTX vs RTX 4080 Super.

RTX 4080 Super Vs RX 6900 XT [Gaming Benchmarks 2024]

We take a deeper look at how a current flagship GPU stacks up against a flagship of the past , as we analyze the performance difference between the RTX 4080 Super Vs RX 6900 XT

RTX 4070 Ti Super Vs RX 6900 XT: Our Recommendation

In this RTX 4070 Ti Super vs RX 6900 XT comparison, we will look at the price, performance, and architecture of these cards.

Similar Guides