Sample Page Title

See full bio

Shehryar Khan

At HI Digital I test and write about different hardware configurations to show other PC users what they can expect from their build. My end goal is to educate the masses to make the right decision when they are looking for new PC parts to buy

See full bio

Getting our hands on Intel’s newest offering, it is now time we put the Core i7-14700K against its predecessor, the Core i7-13700K. In this comparison article, we’ll dive headfirst into the benchmarks of these CPUs and see just how much the new kid on the block outperforms its older sibling. So, join us as we explore the battle of Core i7-14700k vs Core i7-13700K.

Key Takeaways

• Starting off, for enhanced gaming performance, we recommend the Core i7-14700K, as it offers a 2.5% advantage to its users.
• Furthermore, we saw the Core i7-13700K showcases slightly better power efficiency, consuming 2.8% less power compared to the Core i7-14700K.
• When it comes to dealing with thermal results, we examined the Core i7-14700K, which maintains a 3.3% cooler temperature on average.
• As seen, the Core i7-14700K comes at a 3.9% higher price point, but this cost difference can be justified by its slightly superior performance and access to the latest Intel technology.

Comparison Table

Architectural Difference

1. Process Node: Both the Core i7-14700K and Core i7-13700K are built on the same 10nm Intel process node, showcasing Intel’s consistent manufacturing technology.
2. Frequency: The Core i7-14700K boasts a 3.4 GHz Base frequency and a Turbo Clock that can reach up to 5.6 GHz. In contrast, the Core i7-13700K matches the 3.4 GHz Base Frequency but offers a slightly lower Turbo Clock of up to 5.4 GHz, indicating a minor difference in peak clock speed.
3. TDP: Both processors share the same 125W TDP, suggesting a similar power consumption under load for these two Intel CPUs during gameplay.
4. Cores & Threads: The Core i7-14700K boasts an impressive 20 Cores and 28 Threads, providing substantial multi-threading capabilities. On the other hand, the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores and 24 Threads, indicating a notable difference in core count.
5. Supported Technologies: Both processors feature UHD Graphics 770 as their integrated graphics solution, providing similar capabilities for tasks that don’t require discrete graphics cards.

Gaming Tests

After covering the specs and differences in detail, the next thing on the line is to test both of these processors through a number of gaming benchmarks. We will be testing different aspects of their performance at 1080p resolution and checking their overall results.

Test Bench

Here are the specifications of the testing bench that was used for this test:

• CPU: Core i7-14700K, Core i7-13700K
• CPU Cooler: MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360
• Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming
• RAM: G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 32GB (2×16) DDR5 6000MHz CL38
• GPU: GeForce RTX 4090 24GB
• Storage:  2x Samsung 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB
• Operating System: Windows 11
• Power Supply:  Corsair RM850i 850W

Learn: How To Benchmark Your Gaming PC

Cyberpunk 2077

• In our testing, the Core i7-14700K and Core i7-13700K delivered an average FPS of 122 and 120, respectively, showcasing a minor 1.6% lead for the newer Core i7-14700K.
• As we completed performance assessments, the Core i7-14700K exhibited 1% lows of 98 FPS, while the Core i7-13700K scored 97 FPS, signifying a marginal 1% advantage for the newer processor.

Starfield

• The Core i7-14700K outperformed the Core i7-13700K in our Starfield gameplay with an average of 109 FPS compared to 104 FPS, marking a 4.6% advantage in gaming performance.
• We also found the Core i7-14700K outshone the Core i7-13700K with 1% lows of 57 FPS compared to 54 FPS. This 5.4% difference highlights an improved gaming experience with the newer CPU.

The Last of Us Part I

• During our testing, the Core i7-14700K achieved 222 average FPS, while the Core i7-13700K scored 216 FPS, demonstrating a 2.7% lead for the newer processor.
• When it comes to our 1% lows assessment, the Core i7-14700K displayed substantial performance with 152 FPS, while the Core i7-13700K achieved 124 FPS, showcasing a significant 20.2% advantage for the newer processor.

Hitman 3

• As we were testing Hitman 3, we saw the Core i7-14700K maintained an average FPS of 280, while the Core i7-13700K reached 274 FPS. This showcases a 2.1% performance advantage for the Core i7-14700K.
• Similarly, we saw the Core i7-14700K maintained 1% lows of 254 FPS, while the Core i7-13700K reached 238 FPS, resulting in a 6.5% lead for the newer CPU, ensuring smoother gameplay during demanding moments.

Forza Horizon 5

• Similar to before, we witnessed the Core i7-14700K showcased its gaming prowess with an average FPS of 241, while the Core i7-13700K delivered 233 FPS, resulting in a 3.3% difference in favour of the newer CPU.
• Both processors demonstrated impressive consistency in our tests, with the Core i7-14700K achieving 1% lows of 136 FPS and the Core i7-13700K securing 134 FPS, showcasing a minor 1.4% advantage for the newer processor.

Microsoft Flight Simulator

• In our gaming benchmarks, the Core i7-14700K achieved 115 FPS, whereas the Core i7-13700K secured 111 FPS, representing a 3.5% lead for the newer processor.
• Furthermore, during our testing, the Core i7-14700K provided 1% lows of 99 FPS, while the Core i7-13700K achieved 94 FPS, signifying a 5.1% advantage for the newer CPU in maintaining smoother gameplay.

Hogwarts Legacy

• Again, we saw the Core i7-14700K demonstrated an average of 74 FPS, while the Core i7-13700K provided 72 FPS. This 2.7% difference highlights a slight gaming advantage for the newer CPU.
• We also saw the Core i7-14700K showcased 1% lows of 62 FPS, surpassing the Core i7-13700K’s 58 FPS, which translates to a 6.6% difference, ensuring more consistent gaming performance.

Horizon Zero Dawn

• When it comes to gaming performance in our Horizon Zero Daw gameplay, the Core i7-14700K hit 200 average FPS, slightly ahead of the Core i7-13700K, which scored 195 FPS, indicating a 2.5% lead for the newer processor.
• While considering 1% lows, the Core i7-14700K reached 151 FPS, while the Core i7-13700K achieved 147 FPS, indicating a 2.6% advantage for the newer processor, enhancing gaming stability.

Spider-Man Miles Morales

• In our Spiderman Miles Morales gameplay, the Core i7-14700K achieved an average of 128 FPS, while the Core i7-13700K secured 124 FPS, reflecting a 3.1% advantage for the newer CPU.
• Moreover, the Core i7-14700K outperformed the Core i7-13700K with 1% lows of 100 FPS compared to 95 FPS, marking a 5.1% advantage for the newer CPU.

Red Dead Redemption 2

• Interestingly, we saw both the Core i7-14700K and Core i7-13700K maintained an identical average FPS of 179 in our testing, resulting in no significant performance difference between the two processors while playing RDR2.
• In our performance testing, both processors demonstrated comparable 1% lows, with the Core i7-14700K and Core i7-13700K achieving 125 FPS and 123 FPS, respectively, showing a minor 1.6% advantage for the newer CPU.

Overall Gaming Performance

Now, let’s delve into the overall gaming performance. We’ve collected the following data on both the Core i7-14700K and the Core i7-13700K, examining their average FPS and 1% lows in various gaming scenarios.

We consistently saw the Core i7-14700K outperforming the Core i7-13700K, which could very well be due to the difference in generations and technological advancements.

It was also found the Core i7-14700K showcased an average of 167 FPS. On the other hand, the Core i7-13700K got an average of 162.8 FPS on average which leads to a difference of 2.5% in favour of the Core i7-14700K.

As we delve into further statistics of 1% lows, we saw the Core i7-14700K maintaining an average of 123.4 FPS. Meanwhile, the Core i7-13700K maintained an average of 116.4 FPS, showcasing a 5.8% advantage for the Core i7-14700K.

Here is our benchmark video, showing the results of some of the tests we ran of these processors.

Gaming Power Consumption

Now that we have covered the overall gaming performance, let’s take a look at the power consumption and efficiency of these processors during our testing.

Note: Please note that these CPUs feature the same Thermal Design Power (TDP) ratings. The Core i7-14700K is equipped with a 125W TDP, and the Core i7-13700K matches this rating precisely, resulting in no difference between the two.

While going over averages, we found the Core i7-14700K showing an average use of 105.9W. In contrast, the Core i7-13700K drew slightly less power by using 102.9W on average, leading to a difference of 2.8%.

Similar Read: How Much Power Does A Gaming PC Use?

Gaming Temperatures

The next thing on the line is gaming temperatures. We will now take a look at how these processors performed when it comes to thermal efficiency.

Similar to power consumption, we saw both the processors performing equally well when it comes to thermal efficiency.

After we were done compiling all the data from our benchmarking, we found the Core i7-14700K averaging around 53.3°C while the Core i7-13700K averages around 55.1°C, leading to a difference of 3.3% between the two processors.

Prices And Availability

Our research at the moment reveals that the Core i7-14700K comes with a manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) of 409 USD, and since being newly released, it’s accessible on platforms like Amazon, but the availability could be impacted if the demand gets too high.

On the other hand, the Core i7-13700K boasts a slightly lower price tag since it is from the previous generation, coming in at approximately 393 USD, and can be found on Newegg, offering an alternative purchasing option.

While considering the cost of these processors, we see the Core i7-14700K carrying a slightly higher price tag of 3.9%, which could be justified by seeing slightly better performance along with the newest technology currently being offered by Intel. 

Editor`s Note

To tell you the truth, it was quite a close competition between these two processors as they belong to adjacent generations. But I saw the Core i7-14700K taking the win by a slim margin of 2.5%, which definitely plays a big role in why I would recommend this to our readers.

– Shehryar Khan

Core i7-13700K Vs Core i7-14700K: Which One Would We Recommend?

After completing our deep research, we are recommending the Core i7-14700K over the Core i7-13700K for users seeking a gaming performance advantage. The Core i7-14700K showcases an average of 167 FPS, surpassing the Core i7-13700K by 2.5%.

As we were examining power efficiency, our results indicate that the Core i7-13700K is slightly more power-efficient, with an average power consumption of 102.9W compared to the Core i7-14700K’s 105.9W, resulting in a 2.8% difference.

While testing thermal performance, our benchmark data reveals that the Core i7-14700K maintains a cooler average temperature of 53.3°C, as opposed to the Core i7-13700K’s average of 55.1°C. This 3.3% temperature difference suggests that the Core i7-14700K excels in maintaining lower thermal levels.

Concluding by considering the cost aspect, the Core i7-14700K does come at a slightly higher price point, with a 3.9% increase over the Core i7-13700K. This cost difference can be justified by the slightly better performance and the inclusion of the latest technology offered by Intel.

Pros And Cons

Frequently Asked Questions

More From Core i7-13700K:

• Core i9-12900KS Vs Core i7-13700K
• Ryzen 9 7900X3D Vs Core i7-13700K
• Core i9-13900K Vs Core i7-13700K

Shehryar Khan

[How-To Guides Expert]

Laiba, our tech guru at HI Digital, simplifies and crafts How-To Guides with a Google IT Support Certificate. Beyond tech, she captures the city’s aesthetics through her lens. Join her journey where tech meets creativity!

Get In Touch: Laiba@hidgt.com