Sample Page

Sample Page Title

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

Rated: 9/10

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

Rated: 8/10


Pros And Cons

CPUProsCons
Ryzen 7 7840U✅ Better Power Efficiency
✅ Lower TDP Consumption
❌ ECC Support Unavailable
❌ Lower Clock Multiplier
Ryzen 9 7940HS✅ Faster CPU Speed
✅ ECC Memory Support
❌ Higher Power Consumption
❌ Higher TDP

Key Takeaways
  • In our testing, we found that the Ryzen 9 7940HS leads with an impressive advantage in multi-core benchmarks by 17.2%, making it the choice for resource-heavy multitasking scenarios.
  • Moreover, the Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms the Ryzen 7 7840U in single-core benchmarks by 2.7% on average as well, offering faster processing for individual tasks and applications.
  • Furthermore, the Ryzen 7 7840U excels with a lower TDP of 15-30W, while the Ryzen 9 7940HS demands a configurable 35-54W TDP, allowing users to optimize for power efficiency or performance.
  • In addition, both chips support ECC Memory and up to 256GB of DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 memory, ensuring smooth data access and handling memory-intensive computing tasks.
Why Trust Tech4Gamers
  • Manaf is our comparison expert who has been comparing graphics cards, and processors.
  • 500+ components tested and compared by our team of comparison experts (Tech4Gamers Team).
  • 1000+ hours spent testing different components for our comparisons.
  • Objective testing criteria (See how we compare PC hardware).

At Tech4Gamers, ensuring you get reliable information is our priority. That’s why every comparison undergoes a meticulous review process by our team of experts and editors. Each comparison is carefully examined against our strict editorial guidelines, guaranteeing you trustworthy insights you can depend on.


Comparison Table

Key SpecificationsRyzen 9 7940HSRyzen 7 7840U
Performance Cores88
Performance Threads1616
Total Cores88
Total Threads1616
GPU Base Clock1500 MHz1500 MHz
GPU Boost Clock3000 MHz2700 MHz
Cuda Cores768768

Architectural Differences

The Ryzen 9 7940HS Vs Ryzen 7 7840U provide distinct specifications when it comes to their architectural foundations. These disparities although small can play a significant role when it comes to their overall computing prowess. So let’s take a look at each of these major specifications one by one:

  1. Process Node: Pushing the boundaries of innovation, both the Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 7 7840U harness the cutting-edge 4nm fabrication process, delivering exceptional performance efficiency.
  2. Clock Speed: Embracing speed supremacy, the Ryzen 9 7940HS takes the lead with an impressive Base Clock of 4.0 GHz and Boost Clock of 5.2 GHz, while the Ryzen 7 7840U showcases competitive specs with a Base Clock of 3.3 GHz and Boost Clock of 5.1 GHz.
  3. Memory Support Variation: Elevating memory capabilities, both the Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 7 7840U support up to 256GB of DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 memory, unleashing higher bandwidth and faster data access.
  4. TDP: Striking a balance between thermal performance and power efficiency, the Ryzen 7 7840U shines with a configurable TDP of 15-30W, while the Ryzen 9 7940HS demands a broader range of 35-54W (configurable) to accommodate its higher performance potential.
  5. Supported Technologies: Equipped to meet diverse computing needs, the Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 7 7840U come with ECC Memory support, enhancing the ability of error corrections while carrying out critical computing tasks.

Welcome to our detailed analysis of two of AMD’s most powerful processors – the Ryzen 9 7940HS Vs Ryzen 7 7840U. This article compares the two based on their specifications and performance benchmarks. Our goal is to provide you with insightful information that will help you understand the key differences between these two contenders.


Performance Benchmarks

Now that we have dealt with the architectural disparities, we will now run the Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 7 7840U through multiple stress tests. These benchmarks act as a window into their capabilities, providing valuable insights into how these CPUs handle various tasks and applications, allowing us to discern which one excels in specific computing domains.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core) Performance Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In our assessment, we’ve noted that the Ryzen 9 7940HS demonstrates a marginal lead over the Ryzen 7 7840U in single-core performance, with a score of 1839 compared to 1830. This suggests its adeptness in efficiently managing individual tasks.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core) Performance Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • When it comes to multi-core performance, the Ryzen 9 7940HS shows a significant lead, scoring 17509, which is 17% higher than the Ryzen 7 7840U’s score of 14936, highlighting its prowess in multitasking scenarios.

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Performance Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In our single-core benchmarks, the Ryzen 9 7940HS achieves a score of 2033, a 5% improvement over the Ryzen 7 7840U’s score of 1937, showcasing its ability to excel in single-threaded tasks.

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Performance Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • We were impressed by the Ryzen 9 7940HS’s performance in multi-core tasks, maintaining a lead with a score of 12602. It shows a 21% advantage over the Ryzen 7 7840U’s score of 10391, making it a strong contender for handling parallel workloads.

Which Chip Suits Your Needs Best?

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: During our testing, the AMD 9 7940HS demonstrated a significant lead in multi-core performance benchmarks over the Ryzen 7 7840U, making it perfect for handling resource-intensive multitasking scenarios. Additionally, it also outperforms the Ryzen 7 7840U in single-core benchmarks.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: While both processors support ECC Memory, we noticed that the Ryzen 9 7940HS requires a configurable TDP of 35-54W, whereas the Ryzen 7 7840U excels with a lower TDP of 15-30W. This allows us to prioritize power efficiency based on our specific requirements.

We recommend that the users buy the Ryzen 9 7940HS as it dominates the competition easily with distinctive performance in the single-core as well as multicore benchmarks.


FAQs

What are the main differences in performance between the Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 7 7840U?

The Ryzen 9 7940HS exhibits superior performance in both single-core and multi-core benchmarks, making it more adept at handling demanding tasks and multitasking scenarios.

Which processor offers better power efficiency, Ryzen 9 7940HS or Ryzen 7 7840U?

The Ryzen 7 7840U excels in power efficiency with a lower configurable TDP of 15-30W, while Ryzen 9 7940HS demands a higher configurable TDP of 35-54W.

Do both processors support ECC Memory, and what is their memory capacity?

Yes, both Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 7 7840U support ECC Memory and offer memory support up to 256GB of DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500.


More From Ryzen 7 7840U:

More From Ryzen 9 7940HS:

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

Ryzen 5 3600 Vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Our Recommendation

We compared the Ryzen 5 3600 Vs Ryzen 7 3700X to show you how well these two mid-range processors perform in 2024.

Ryzen 9 7950X Vs Ryzen 9 7900X [We Tested 10 Games]

With the same release date, the Ryzen 9 7950X Vs Ryzen 9 7900X are so similar yet so different. What makes them that way? Let's out!

Core i5-14600K Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D: [We Tested 12 Games]

In this battle of the Core i5-14600K vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D, we will explore the technical specs and performance differences between the 2 CPUs.

Core i5 13400 Vs Ryzen 5 5600: We Tested Both In 2024

The Core i5 13400 Vs Ryzen 5 5600 comparison will take a look at the performance of Intel's and AMD's best budget processors.

i9 14900K Vs i7 13700KF: Our Recommendation

The Core i9 14900K vs i7 13700KF comparison will check the performance of Intel's high-end option against its mid-ranger from the last gen.

Similar Guides