Sample Page

Sample Page Title

Intel Core i9 13980HX

Rated: 8.5/10

Apple M2 Max

Rated: 8/10


Pros And Cons

CPUProsCons
Core i9 13980HX✅ Overclockable
✅ Lots of threads
❌ High Power consumption
❌ Higher Thermal Levels
Apple M2 Max✅ Integrated Memory
✅ Power efficient
❌ Limited Availability
❌ High Price

Key Takeaways
  • The Core i9 13980HX performs exceptionally well on our single-core test, while the Apple M2 Max distinguishes it for the multi-core test in our Core i9 13980HX vs Apple M2 Max comparison.
  • The Core i9 13980HX ensures effective data processing by supporting up to 128GB of memory through 2 memory channels, while the Apple M2 Max supports up to 96GB of memory via 8 memory channels.
  • We also observed that the M2 Max offers great performance without consuming as much power as the Core i9 13980HX since it is more energy-efficient.
Why Trust Tech4Gamers
  • Uzair is our comparison expert who has been comparing graphics cards, and processors.
  • 500+ components tested and compared by our team of comparison experts (Tech4Gamers Team).
  • 1000+ hours spent testing different components for our comparisons.
  • Objective testing criteria (See how we compare PC hardware).

At Tech4Gamers, ensuring you get reliable information is our priority. That’s why every comparison undergoes a meticulous review process by our team of experts and editors. Each comparison is carefully examined against our strict editorial guidelines, guaranteeing you trustworthy insights you can depend on.


Core i9 13980HX vs Apple M2 Max – Comparison Table

ModelIntelApple
Model numberJanuary 3, 2023January 17, 2023
VendorLaptopLaptop
Typex86-64ARMv8
Instruction setRaptor LakeApple M2
Codenamei9-13980HX-
Integrated GPUUHD Graphics (32EU)Apple M2 Max GPU (38-core)
Bus Frequency100 MHz-
Multiplier22x35x
L1 Cache80K (per core)192K (per core)
L2 Cache2MB (per core)32MB (shared)
L3 Cache36MB (shared)-
Unlocked MultiplierNoNo
Integrated GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics (32EU)Apple M2 Max GPU (38-core)
GPU Base Clock300 MHz450 MHz
GPU Boost Clock1650 MHz1398 MHz
Shading Units2564864
TMUs16304
ROPs8152
Execution Units32608
TGP45 W70 W

Architectural Differences

  • Core and Threads: The M2 Max maintains an ideal core-to-thread ratio with 24 cores and 12 threads, enabling effective processing resource utilization and seamless multitasking. However, the 12 threads and 32 cores of the Core i9 13980HX offer a benefit for heavily threaded tasks, offering improved performance in distributed programs.
  • Clock Speed: A strong foundation for dependable and smooth performance is provided by the Core i9 13980HX’s basic clock speed of 2.2GHz. However, its amazing boost clock speed of 5.6GHz is where its true strength resides.
    In contrast, the M2 Max has a faster base clock speed of 2.4GHz and a boost clock of up to 3.7GHz. This indicates that, as compared to the Core i9 13980HX, it works at a faster base speed.
  • TDP: Users may regulate power consumption depending on their unique demands with the customizable TDP of 55W offered by the Intel Core i9 13980HX, maximizing performance and energy savings. The Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a set TDP of 79W and focuses on power efficiency while providing an equitable performance-to-power ratio.
  • Supported Technologies: Apple’s exclusive Apple Silicon architecture, which is meant to be highly effective and power-friendly, forms the foundation of the M2 Max. Contrarily, a larger range of technologies, including Intel Thread Director and Turbo Boost Max 3.0, are supported by the Core i9 13980HX.

Apple and Intel are well-known manufacturers of top-of-the-line processors that deliver outstanding performance in the world of computers. The i9 13980HX vs M2 Max, Intel, and Apple’s top-of-the-line chip, are the most recent products from each manufacturer, both aimed towards professionals who want exceptional performance.

We will examine each processor’s characteristics in-depth and evaluate how they compare to one another in our extensive comparison of the Core i9 13980HX and Apple M2 Max.


Benchmark Tests

This section of the M2 Max vs Core i9 13980HX comparison will concentrate on the increase in real-world performance on both CPUs now that we’ve understood much of what differentiates the two chips.

Laptops Used:

  • Titan GT77HX 13VI-042US 17.3″ UHD Gaming Laptop (Core i9 13980HX)
  • M2 Max 16″ MacBook Pro (Apple M2 Max)

Geekbench 5 Single-Core Score

GB Single Core
Geek Bench Single Core Scores (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • In our Geekbench Single-core benchmarks, the Apple M2 Max scored an impressive 2,067 points.
  • With a score of around 2,081 points, the Core i9 13980HX demonstrated a minor increase of 0.675%. This improvement in efficiency is due to the Core i9 13980HX’s faster clock rates.

Geekbench 5 Multi-Core Score

GB Multi Core i9 13980HX vs M2 Max
Geek Bench Multi Core Scores (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • The Apple M2 Max scored somewhere around 15,359 points for multi-core performance.
  • We were shocked to see that the Core i9 13980HX exceeded the 20,000-point threshold in Geekbench 5, scoring 21,006 points, showcasing a notable increase of 31.05%.

Geekbench 5 Metal GPU Score

GB Metal GPU
Geek Bench 5 Metal GPU Scores (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • The M2 Max delivers impressive visual fidelity and smoothness in our graphically demanding applications with a score of 86,092.
  • The Core i9 13980HX surpasses its rival with a remarkable score of 254,831, setting a new benchmark for GPU performance.

Speedometer 2.0 Web Browsing

Speedometer 2.0
Speedometer 2.0 Web Browsing Runs Per Minute (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • The M2 Max is impressive for finishing 434 runs in our Speedometer 2.0 test. It provides a seamless and non-stop online viewing experience, providing effective page navigation.
  • Speedometer 2.0 test shows off the Core i9 13980HX’s capabilities in online browsing productivity with 369 runs. We saw that it also offers users quick page loads and optimized web interactivity.

Figma 500 Designs Webpage Export

Figma 500 Designs
Figma 500 Designs Webpage Export (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • The M2 Max proves its effectiveness by successfully exporting 500 high-resolution webpages from Figma in just 1 minute and 35 seconds. It guarantees an efficient and effective design process.
  • The Core i9 13980HX’s export time, which was 1 minute and 31 seconds quicker, demonstrates its high-performance potential. It excels at managing difficult design projects and enables users to export a sizable number of high-resolution websites easily.

Cinebench R23 Points Per Watt

Cinebench R23 Scores
Cinebench R23 Points Per Watt (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • The M2 Max’s outstanding score of 400 points per watt demonstrates its capacity to utilize power resources to the fullest extent possible in our Cinebench test. High-performance computing is made possible for professionals without sacrificing power efficiency.
  • Even while the Core i9 13980HX scored somewhat lower (205 points per watt), it still exhibits a significant amount of performance potential. It serves customers who value striking a balance between raw processing capability and power efficiency.

3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited

3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life Extreme FPS (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • The M2 Max attained a performance of 150.7 FPS during the graphics-intensive test we carried out, which placed the CPU’s visuals module to the test.
  • A fantastic performance from, the Core i9 13980HX outperformed the M2 Max by a large margin of 53.04%. It managed to execute at 259.5 FPS, demonstrating a significant increase in graphics capacity.

Blender Rendering – BMW

Blender BMW
Blender BMW Render (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • The depiction of the BMW project was finished by our M2 Max in around 21.8 seconds.
  • However, when we loaded the identical project on the Core i9 13980HX, the rendering speed significantly increased. Just 5.4 seconds after pressing the render button, the render was complete.

Blender Rendering – PartyTug

Blender Party Tug
Blender Party Tug Render (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • Users are able to swiftly accomplish rendering jobs due to the M2 Max’s 1-minute and 4-second rendering time, which guarantees a productive workflow.
  • The Core i9 13980HX’s outstanding 13-second rendering speed highlights its unmatched efficiency and unbridled computing power. It enables experts to tackle even the most difficult rendering assignments quickly and effectively.

Lightroom Classic 499x Photo Export

Lightroom Photo Export i9 13980HX vs M2 Max
Lightroom Photo Export (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • The M2 Max produced the Lightroom project with a photo export resolution of 499x in around 3 minutes and 58 seconds.
  • Nevertheless, when we exported the identical image using the Core i9 13980HX, we saw a significant reduction in export time. With a noteworthy increase of 31.63%, the export was finished in just 2 minutes and 53 seconds.

 Resolve 18 5min 4K HEVC Export

Resolve 18 5 Min 4K HEV i9 13980HX vs M2 Max
Resolve 18 5 Min 4K HEVC Export (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • The 4K HEVC export is finished by the M2 Max in under 45 seconds, showcasing its effectiveness. It simplifies the post-production procedure, saving experts important time.
  • While exporting in HEVC, the Core i9 13980HX preserves the quality of the 4K film despite having a slightly longer export duration of 59 seconds. It guarantees the transmission of high-quality, compressed videos fit for usage by professionals.

Core i9 13980HX vs Apple M2 Max – Which One Should You Choose?

The Apple M2 Max and the Intel Core i9 13980HX are both high-performance CPUs, and they are designed for various types of devices.

Intel Core i9 13980HX: The Intel Core i9 13980HX supports 128GB memory via 2 channels. The processor also ensures efficient processing, especially for single-core tasks. We also discovered that with an unlocked multiplier, users can adjust clock speed for optimal performance.

Apple M2 Max: Designed for desktops, the Apple M2 Max features improved power efficiency in our benchmarks. It excels in multi-core performance. Supporting up to 192GB of memory via 8 channels, it enables smooth multitasking and faster data movement between CPU and memory.

We recommend the Intel Core i9 13980HX as it has a powerful impact on the benchmarks we tested in this comparison. Moreover, this processor is also overclockable which further increases the impact of the Core i9 13980HX.


Frequently Asked Questions

Which CPU is most suitable for gaming?

Compared to the M2 Max, the Core i9 13980HX could be a superior option for gaming. This is due to the Core i9 13980HX’s faster clock speed and increased core count.

Which processor is most effective for editing videos?

Both the Apple M2 Max and the Core i9 13980HX make great video editing processors. However, for specific jobs, like editing 4K or 8K footage, the M2 Max would be a superior option.

Which processor is more effective for machine learning?

In comparison to the Core i9 13980HX, the M2 Max could be a superior option for machine learning. This is due to the 16-core Neural Engine in the M2 Max, which is built for machine learning workloads.


More From Core i9 13980HX:

More From Apple M2 Max:

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

Ryzen 5 3600 Vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Our Recommendation

We compared the Ryzen 5 3600 Vs Ryzen 7 3700X to show you how well these two mid-range processors perform in 2024.

Ryzen 9 7950X Vs Ryzen 9 7900X [We Tested 10 Games]

With the same release date, the Ryzen 9 7950X Vs Ryzen 9 7900X are so similar yet so different. What makes them that way? Let's out!

Core i5-14600K Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D: [We Tested 12 Games]

In this battle of the Core i5-14600K vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D, we will explore the technical specs and performance differences between the 2 CPUs.

Core i5 13400 Vs Ryzen 5 5600: We Tested Both In 2024

The Core i5 13400 Vs Ryzen 5 5600 comparison will take a look at the performance of Intel's and AMD's best budget processors.

i9 14900K Vs i7 13700KF: Our Recommendation

The Core i9 14900K vs i7 13700KF comparison will check the performance of Intel's high-end option against its mid-ranger from the last gen.

Similar Guides