AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Rated: 8.5/10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Rated: 8.6/10
Pros And Cons
GPU | Pros | Cons |
RX 6750 XT | ✅Solid overall performance ✅Optimal thermal management | ❌Relatively higher Cost |
RTX 3070 | ✅Remarkable 1440p gaming experiences ✅Ray tracing capabilities | ❌Power limit constraints |
- The RTX 3070 slightly outperforms the RX 6750 XT, with a marginal 1.2% difference in average FPS across various tests.
- The RTX 3070 exhibits 7% better thermal efficiency while the RX 6750 XT consumes 9.3% less power on average compared to the RTX 3070.
- The RTX 3070 is priced slightly higher than the RX 6750 XT, with a difference of around 13% at the time of the article.
- If energy efficiency and budget are key concerns, the RX 6750 XT offers a compelling option. For those seeking better thermal performance and willing to invest slightly more, the RTX 3070 is a suitable choice.
Comparison Table
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
Node | TSMC 7nm | Samsung 8nm |
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
CUDA Cores | 2,560 | 5888 |
Memory Clock | 18 Gbps | 14 Gbps |
Memory Bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
RT Cores | 40 | 46 |
Memory Interface | 192-bit | 256-bit |
Best Variants | – | Best RTX 3070 |
Architectural Difference
- Process Node: The RX 6750 XT embraces the advanced 7nm process node, while the RTX 3070 makes its stand on the 8nm process node.
- Clock Speed: The RX 6750 XT showcases a Base Clock of 2150 MHz and a Boost Clock of 2600 MHz, whereas the RTX 3070 maintains a Base Clock of 1500 MHz and a Boost Clock of 1725 MHz.
- VRAM: Diving into memory supremacy, the RX 6750 XT flexes with 12GB of high-speed GDDR6 VRAM, while the RTX 3070 boasts 8GB GDDR6 of its own.
- TDP: Shining light on power dynamics, the RX 6750 XT requires 250W TDP, in contrast to the RTX 3070’s 220W TDP, offering insights into energy efficiency.
- Supported Technologies: In the realm of technology fusion, the RTX 3070 capitalizes on DLSS technology, while the RX 6750 XT employs the innovative FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) for enhanced gaming visuals.
In this analysis we will explore the performance disparity between RX 6750 XT vs RTX 3070, shedding light on the advancements made by both GPU manufacturers in their previous generation offerings. Our team has also thoroughly reviewed the GIGABYTE RTX 3070 VISION OC.
Gaming Performance Benchmarks
Specifications seem all good on paper, but the real mettle of a GPU is tested by benchmarks. To ensure accuracy and precision, we will test both GPUs across 8 titles at 1440p resolution to determine if they are worthy of their specifications.
Testing Rig
- CPU: Intel Core i7 13700k
- Motherboard: ASRock B650E PG-ITX WIFI Motherboard
- CPU Cooler: be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
- RAM: XPG Lancer RGB 32GB 7200MHz DDR5 Ram
- SSD: Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus G 2TB NVMe SSD
- Power Supply: ENERMAX REVOLUTION D.F. X 1050W
- OS: Windows 10 Pro
Red Dead Redemption 2
- While playing Red Dead Redemption 2, the RTX 3070 acquires an average of 79 FPS, placing ahead of the RX 6750 XT’s 72 FPS. A 9.7% boost in performance.
- The RX 6750 XT wins the power bout, drawing 195 W of power as compared to the Nvidia giant’s 210 W.
God Of War
- In my session of God of War, the RX 6750 XT outperforms the RTX 3070 with an average FPS of 82 compared to the latter’s 73 FPS. This translates to a respectable 12.3% lead.
- Staying true to its higher TDP, the RTX 3070 consumes around 220 W, while the RX 6750 XT gets by with just 200 W.
Dying Light 2
- The RX 6750 XT surpasses the RTX 3070 with an average FPS of 79, outperforming the RTX 3070’s 76 FPS. This results in a notable 4% difference in favor of the RX 6750 XT.
- A mean GPU wattage of 190 W is displayed by the RX 6750 XT over the RTX 3070’s 210 W.
Cyberpunk 2077
- In Cyberpunk 2077, the RTX 3070 achieves 67 FPS compared to the RX 6750 XT’s 64 FPS. This represents a significant 4.7% increase in FPS for the RTX 3070.
- The RTX 3070 hungrily eats up around 220 W of power, while its challenger meets its fill at a considerably lower 190 W.
Days Gone
- The RTX 3070 outshines the RX 6750 XT with an average FPS of 97, surpassing its competitor’s 94 FPS. This represents a significant 3.2% lead.
- Averaging at about 200 W, the RX 6750 XT once again takes the upper hand over its contender’s 220 W.
Hitman 3
- In my Hitman 3 session, the RX 6750 XT takes the lead with an average FPS of 126, surpassing the RTX 3070’s 122 FPS.
- The power gap is lessened this time, as the RX 6750 XT consumes around 205 W time when put against the RTX 3070’s 210 W.
Forza Horizon 5
- Here, the RTX 3070 achieves an average FPS of 74, outperforming the RX 6750 XT’s 71 FPS. This results in a notable 4.2% increase in FPS for the RTX 3070.
- Widening the power gap again, the RTX 3070 ravenously consumes 200 W of power, while the RX 6750 XT requires just 170 W to run this title at 1440p.
Horizon Zero Dawn
- Exhibiting absolute superiority in our final title, the RTX 3070 delivers an impressive 92 FPS compared to the RX 6750 XT’s 84 FPS. With a notable 9.5% increase in FPS.
- Regarding the power supply, the RX 6750 XT utilizes 195 W of power, while the RTX 3070 gobbles up 200 W of power.
Overall Gaming Performance
Featured | RTX 3070 | RX 6750 XT |
Average FPS | 85.4📈 | 84.4📈 |
Winner: NVIDIA's RTX 3070 |
Overall, after thorough testing in 8 games at 1440p resolution, the RTX 3070 emerged with an average FPS of 85.4, slightly edging out the RX 6750 XT’s 84.4 FPS. However, with just a 1.2% difference in FPS, it is difficult to declare a definitive winner between the two GPUs, especially considering the limited number of games tested.
Thermal Efficiency
Featured | RTX 3070 (°C) | RX 6750 XT (°C) |
Average Temperature | 62🌡️ | 66.25🌡️ |
Winner: NVIDIA's RTX 3070 |
The RTX 3070 acquires an average running temperature of 62°C. On the contrary, the RX 6750 XT operates at an average temperature of 66.3°C. A generous 7% increase in temperature stability is exhibited by the RTX 3070, declaring it as the clear winner in this respect.
Power Consumption
Featured | RTX 3070 (W) | RX 6750 XT (W) |
Average Power Consumption | 211.25⚡️ | 193.12⚡️ |
Winner: AMD's RX 6750 XT |
The RTX 3070 achieves an average power consumption of 211 W among all games tested. The RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, consumes about 193 W on average. A 9.3% less power consumption is showcased by the RX 6750 XT.
Pricing And Availability
GPU | MSRP | Current Price |
RX 6750 XT | 💲549 | 💲350 |
RTX 3070 | 💲499 | 💲400 |
Difference | 9.5% | 13.33% |
There is a difference of around 13% between the current prices of these GPUs. The RTX 3070 is available at Amazon for a price tag upwards of $400. On the other hand, the RX 6750 XT is widely available with a price as low as $350.
Final Verdict – What We Recommend?
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT: The RX 6750 XT offers commendable gaming performance at a relatively lower power consumption compared to its counterpart, the RTX 3070. With its 12GB of high-speed GDDR6 VRAM and competitive pricing, it presents a compelling option.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070: The RTX 3070 showcases slightly better gaming performance, boasting a marginal 1.2% lead in average FPS over the RX 6750 XT. Its superior thermal efficiency, with 7% cooler average temperatures, positions it as a favorable choice for users emphasizing temperature management.
Overall, if you’re seeking a balance between performance and energy efficiency without compromising on gaming experience, the RX 6750 XT stands as a strong contender. However, if you prioritize slightly higher gaming performance and superior thermal management, the RTX 3070 presents a compelling alternative.
FAQs
In terms of gaming performance, the RTX 3070 edges ahead with 1.2% a slightly higher average FPS across various tests.
The RTX 3070 tends to have better temperature management, maintaining 7% cooler average temperatures compared to the RX 6750 XT.
The RX 6750 XT consumes 9.3% less power than the RTX 3070, making it more energy-efficient.
Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋
How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔
Feedback By: